The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the law laid down with the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Consequently, the competent authority of your parent department from the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits with the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

four.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of someday inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained by the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of the alleged occurrence as well as prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired for being the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't respond at all for the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of events that extra judicial confession of an accused is really a weak form of evidence which may be manoeuvred with the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is additionally counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding presence of some light in the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners alongside one another on the motorcycle at four.

Deterrence: The worry of severe consequences, such as capital punishment, is meant to deter prospective criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is crucial in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.

These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on proven here judicial authority to formulate their positions.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

The ruling on the first court created case law that must be accompanied by other courts right until or Except both new law is created, or a higher court rules differently.

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in implementing the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases heard in the state court, with the same level.

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its unique purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, as well as case law at both the federal and state levels.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its opportunity to secure financial interests and maintain the integrity of the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of those changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.

104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is perfectly set up now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar to your civil servant service framework but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it is actually lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if contented that a civil servant who was entitled for being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his have, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of this kind of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.